RUSSELL WILLIAMS AND JOHN MUSCEDERE
CANADIANS 65 years and older now outnumber children 14 years and under, which means our needs as a society are changing. We are succeeding in shifting the aging curve through preventive interventions and better public health — that’s good news.
But the changing demographic is causing strains in our health and social care supports. How can Canada rise to the challenge?
There are many calls for a national strategy for seniors, or for home care, palliative care, dementia and pharmacare strategies, which will affect care for seniors.
However, any strategy targeting seniors cannot be based solely on age — but should be based on risk and vul! nerability— or what is known as “frailty.”
Taking frailty into account may both improve and help save our fractured health system.
Frailty can occur at any age and describes individuals who are in precarious health, have significant multiple health impairments and are at higher risk of dying.
The hallmark of frailty is that minor illnesses such as infections or minor injuries, which would minimally affect non-frail individuals, may trigger rapid and dramatic deterioration in health.
Getting older doesn’t necessarily mean you are frail. It does mean that as you age you are more likely to become frail. Frailty isa more precise, and evidence-based, determinant of health outcomes and health care utilization than age alone.
The ! most rapidly increasing segment of the population is individua! ls over 80 years old, and more than 50 per cent of those over
the age of 80 are frail.
A large, growing proportion of our health and social care spending is, and will increasingly be, focused on older Canadians living with frailty.
From a societal perspective, frailty also places large burdens on family, friends and caregivers, including financial, social and productivity costs.
Everyone is affected by frailty.
Yet frailty is poorly understood, pervasively under-recognized and under-appreciated by health-care professionals and the public. Not enough health-care professionals have expertise in car! ing for older adults that live with frailty and we do not have sufficient evidence to guide the care of older adults living with frailty.
So, what would transformed health- and social-care systems look like if frailty were considered?
First, all older adults coming into contact with the health-care system would be proactively screened for the presence of frailty or risk factors for its development. By using readily available, easy-to-use tools to identify frailty, proactive models of care and interventions could be put in place to prevent or delay its development or progression. Care planning would also start early rather than waiting for a crisis.
Next, older adults living with frailty, and their family, friends and caregivers, would be involved at every stage of system change. When citizens are engaged in decision making, ! it improves the patient experience, contributes to more cost-effectiv! e services and enhances the overall quality of our health- and social-care systems.
The Canadian Frailty Network undertook a study aimed at identifying priority areas based on input from Canadians affected by older adults living with frailty.
The two top priorities identified dealt with: better organization of health- and social-care systems to provide integrated and co-ordinated care; and tailoring care, services and treatments to meet the needs of older adults who are isolated or without family and caregiver support or advocates.
Rehabilitative and social supports to improve care and quality of life would include non-medical interventions to address such issues as nutrition, exercise and mobility,! advance care planning, oral care and social isolation. And innovative approaches to residential care needs would help seniors remain in the community independently as long as possible, including those who live with frailty.
Caregivers would be supported to ease the economic and other burdens of home care. Support for caregivers of older adults has been shown to reduce institutionalization, hospitalization and readmission.
Evidence says transforming our health- and social-care systems to include frailty would produce both health and economic benefits. Such benefits would be real and significant for older Canadians, their families and for those on the front lines delivering care.
Russell Williams is chair of the board of directors of the Canadian Frailty Network, vice-president, government relations and public policy at Diabete! s Canada and an expert adviserwith evidencenetwork.ca. Dr. John Muscede! re is the scientific director and CEO of the Canadian Frailty Network. He’s also an expert adviser with Eeidencenetwork.ca, professor of critical care medicine at Queen’s University and an intensivist at Kingston General Hospital.